By: Rafeeat Bishi
The video on the Apu character from The Simpsons prompted some thinking. Hari Kondabolu made very good points as to why certain humor can not be brushed off as "jokes"
Today, people are becoming more comfortable with speaking out against offensive comments. However, when most marginalized groups bring this up, they're seen as easily offended and sensitive. I don't think it's "sensitive" to not appreciate rude comments.
Kondabolu made me think a lot about satire. By definition, satire is "the use of humor, irony, exaggeration, or ridicule to expose and criticize people's stupidity or vices, particularly in the context of contemporary politics and other topical issues".
The show Boondocks is the perfect example. When Riley makes homophobic jokes or Uncle Ruckus makes completely racist comments, it's seen as funny and humorous because of how outrageous they are. They, like many other characters in the show, represent exaggerated versions of the black community. Riley is the impressionable, homophobic, toxic masculinity black male, and Uncle Ruckus is the self-hating black male. They're offense is the essence of their characters, which is why most gay people would not have problems with Riley's jokes. They're not the butt of the joke. He is.
Like that man said in the video (which Kondabolu made a good point shooting down) Comedy is supposed to stem from conflict. What's funny about the conflict of Apu's situation? The fact that there's a chance he'll stay at that store to support his family for the rest of his life? That's not biting satire or humor. Its bullying.
The next time someone ridicules a culture or makes jokes about lifestyles, I hope one considers the nuances of what they're saying. Be wary of the groups affected by your "jokes".